Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order; Second...

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status

No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
30795	Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order; Second...	Migrated

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3060-0741	ICR Reference No: 199909-3060-030
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 199608-3060-011
Agency/Subagency: FCC	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order; Second...
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 10/29/1999
	Date Received in OIRA: 09/29/1999
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	10/31/2002	10/31/2002	10/31/1999
Responses	2,000	0	1,350
Time Burden (Hours)	228,750	0	202,980
Cost Burden (Dollars)	60,000	0	60,000

---

Abstract: In the Second Order of Reconsideration, the Commission resolves and clarifies specific issues regarding the nondiscriminatory access obligations of local exchange carriers. The Commission clarifies that, upon request, a LEC shall provide access to its directory assistance services and to its directory listings in any format the competing provider specifies, if the LEC's internal systems can accommodate the format. LECs must supply updates. In the NPRM, the Commission seeks comment on issues arising out of developments in, and the convergence of, directory publishing and directory assistance.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 -- CC Docket No. 96-98, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order; Second...

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	2,000	1,350	0	650	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	228,750	202,980	0	25,770	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	60,000	60,000	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 09/29/1999

---