Document
Coordination Feedback Form
ICR 202001-0970-007 · OMB 0970-0519 · Object 98180602.
⚠️ Notice: This form may be outdated. More recent filings and information on OMB 0970-0519 can be found here:
Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | txt
TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COORDINATION FEEDBACK Form OMB Control Number: 0970-0519 Expiration Date: 05/31/2020 In order to help the National Human Trafficking Training and Technical Assistance Center (NHTTAC) better serve the field, we are reaching out to obtain your feedback. We will protect the privacy of your information in accordance with the Federal Privacy Act, and we will protect the confidentiality of your responses using procedures we have in place, including reporting all information in aggregate to avoid identifying information. Only members of the NHTTAC Evaluation Team have access to information that could identify respondents. If you have any questions about this survey or the evaluation, please contact NHTTACEval@icf.com. EVENT: DATE(S): Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements: TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (T/TA) FEEDBACK Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 1. It was easy to work with NHTTAC. 1 2 3 4 2. The T/TA aligned with OTIP’s goals and priorities. 1 2 3 4 3. Overall, this was an effective way to support the content and purpose of the meeting. NHTTAC collaborated with the necessary stakeholders to meet the objective(s) of the T/TA. The T/TA was grounded in a multidisciplinary approach to addressing human trafficking. 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 4. 5. 6. The T/TA reflected a public health approach to addressing human trafficking. 1 2 3 4 7. The T/TA was trauma informed. 1 2 3 4 8. The T/TA was survivor informed. 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 11.1 2 3 4 12. 1 2 3 4 13. 1 2 3 4 14. 1 2 3 4 15. 1 2 3 4 9. NHTTAC staff effectively responded to any obstacles or challenges surrounding the planning or implementation of the T/TA. 10. The T/TA was based on current evidence-based research or promising practices. Please indicate the extent to which the T/TA met each stated objective: T/TA OBJECTIVES 16. What could NHTTAC have done differently to better support the objectives of the T/TA? Thank you for taking the time to complete this form and helping to improve NHTTAC activities. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to enable NHTTAC to collect recipient and stakeholder feedback to improve NHTTAC’s T/TA service delivery. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.05 hours per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This is a voluntary collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact the NHTTAC Evaluation Team at NHTTACEval@icf.com or 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031.
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | 15 - Coordination Feedback.docx |
| Author | Field, Michael |
| File Modified | 2020-03-20 |
| File Created | 2020-03-20 |