Interior/wbr-48

Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 75/Thursday, April 17, 2008/Notices
a part of the Piro Province in early
contact era New Mexico (16th century).
Archeological and historical evidence
link the inhabitants of the Piro Province
to the present-day inhabitants of the
Pueblo of Ysleta del Sur of Texas. Based
on material culture, site organization
and architecture, site AR 03—03—03—334
has been identified as a small,
prehistoric Puebloan habitation site that
was occupied between AD. 900 and
A.D. 1250/1300, in the Piro Province of
central New Mexico. The present-day
descendants of the Piro Province
populations are the Pueblo of Ysleta del
Sur of Texas. Oral traditions provided
by representatives of the Pueblo of
Ysleta del Sur of Texas support cultural
affiliation.
Officials of the Cihola National Forest
have determined that, pursuant to 25
U.s.c. 3001 (9—10), the human remains
described above represent the physical
remains of one individual of Native
American ancestry. Officials of the
Cihola National Forest also have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001 (3)(A), the 15 objects described
above are reasonably believed to have
been placed with or near individual
human remains at the time of death or
later as part of the death rite or
ceremony. Lastly, officials of the Cibola
National Forest have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.s.c. 3001 (2), there is
a relationship of shared group identity
that can be reasonably traced between
the Native American human remains
and associated funerary objects and the
Pueblo of Ysleta del Sur of Texas.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains and/
or associated funerary objects should
contact Dr. Frank E. Wozniak, NAGPRA
coordinator, Southwestern Region,
USDA Forest Service, 333 Broadway
Boulevard SE, Albuquerque, NM 87102,
telephone (sos) 842—3238, before May
19, 2008. Repatriation of the human
remains and associated funerary objects
to the Pueblo of Ysleta del Sur of Texas
may proceed after that date if no
additional claimants come forward.
Cibola National Forest is responsible
for notifying the Pueblo of Ysleta del
Sur of Texas that this notice has been
published.
Dated: March 18, 2008.
Sherry Hull,
Monoger, Notionol NAGPRA Progrom.
[FR Doc. E8—8307 Filed 4—17—08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312—50—S

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Coast Guard, 13th Coast Guard
District, Seattle, WA, and Oregon State
University Department of
Anthropology, Corvallis, OR
AGENCY: National
ACTION: Notice.

Park Service, Interior.

Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains in the control of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Coast Guard, 13th Coast Guard District,
Seattle, WA, and in the possession of
Oregon State University Department of
Anthropology, Corvallis, OR. The
human remains were removed from
Chiefs Island and Gregory Point, Coos
County, OR.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by Oregon State
University Department of Anthropology
professional staff on behalf of the U.S.
Coast Guard, 13th Coast Guard District,
in consultation with representatives of
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower
Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians of Oregon.
In 1977, human remains representing
a minimum of one individual were
removed from 35C5011 in Coos County,
OR, during a cultural resource
evaluation project conducted under the
supervision of John Draper and Glenn
Hartmann of the Department of
Anthropology, Oregon State University.
No known individual was identified. No
associated funerary objects are present.
The site, near Cape Arago lighthouse
installation, is on United States Coast
Guard property. The site is located on
Chiefs Island and Gregory Point, an area
that is used for burials by the
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower
Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians. The site
is also located within the ancestral
territory of the Confederated Tribes of
the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw
Indians of Oregon as outlined in tribal
Resolution No. 91—010.
Officials of the Oregon State
University Department of Anthropology,

20949

on behalf of the U.S. Coast Guard, 13th
Coast Guard District, have determined
that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9—10),
the human remains described above
represent the physical remains of one
individual of Native American ancestry.
Officials of the Oregon State University
Department of Anthropology, on behalf
of the U.S. Coast Guard, 13th Coast
Guard District, also have determined
that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2),
there is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the Native American human
remains and the Confederated Tribes of
the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw
Indians of Oregon.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Dr. David McMurray,
Oregon State University Department of
Anthropology, 238 Waldo Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331, telephone (541)
737—4515, before May 19, 2008.
Repatriation of the human remains to
the Confederated Tribes of the Coos,
Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians of
Oregon may proceed after that date if no
additional claimants come forward.
Oregon State University Department
of Anthropology is responsible for
notifying the Burns Paiute Tribe of the
Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon;
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower
Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians of Oregon;
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde
Community of Oregon; Confederated
Tribes of the Siletz Reservation, Oregon;
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Reservation, Oregon; Confederated
Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation
of Oregon; Coquille Tribe of Oregon;
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians of
Oregon; and Klamath Tribes, Oregon
that this notice has been published.
Dated: March 12, 2008.
Sherry Hull,
Monoger, Notionoi NAGPRA Progrom.
lEE Doc. E8—8200 Filed 4—16—08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312—SO—S

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Privacy Act of 1974; as Amended;
Amendments to Existing Systems of
Records
AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.
Proposed amendment
existing systems of records.

ACTION:

of

In accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
Bureau of Reclamation is issuing public
SUMMARY:

20950

Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 75/Thursday, April 17, 2008/Notices

notice of its intent to amend 22 existing
Privacy Act system of records notices to
add a new routine use to authorize the
disclosure of records to individuals
involved in responding to a breach of
Federal data.
DATES: Comments received on or before
May 27, 2008 will be considered.
ADDRESSES: Any persons interested in
commenting on these proposed
amendments may do so by submitting
comments in writing to the Bureau of
Reclamation Privacy Act Officer, Mr.
Casey Snyder, Bureau of Reclamation,
84—21300, Building 67, P.O. Box 25007,
Denver, Colorado 80225 or by e-mail to
csnyder@ido.osbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Reclamation Privacy Act
Officer, Mr. Casey Snyder, at 303—445—
2048.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May

22, 2007, in a memorandum for the
heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies entitled “Safeguarding Against

and Responding to the Breach of
Personally Identifiable Information,” the
Office of Management and Budget
directed agencies to develop and
publish a routine use for disclosure of
information in connection with
response and remedial efforts in the
event of a data breach. This routine use
will serve to protect the interest of the
individuals whose information is at

issue by allowing agencies to take
appropriate steps to facilitate a timely
and effective response to the breach,

thereby improving its ability to prevent,
minimize or remedy any harm resulting
from a compromise of data maintained

in its systems of records. Accordingly,
the Bureau of Reclamation, Department
of the Interior, is proposing to add a
new routine use to authorize disclosure
to appropriate agencies, entities, and
persons, of information maintained in
the following systems in the event of a
data breach.
These amendments will be effective
as proposed at the end of the comment
period unless comments are received
which would require a contrary
determination. Reclamation will publish
a revised notice if changes are made
based upon a review of comments
received.
Dated: March 14, 2008.
Randy Feuerstein,
Chief Inform eden Officer, Denver Office.
SYSTEM NAMES:

Interior, WBR—s: “Claims.”
(Published March 17, 1999, 64 FR
13234)

Interior, WBR—7: “Concessions.”
(Published December 9, 1999, 64 FR
69032)

Interior, WBR—1 1: “Identification!
Security Cards.” (Published February 9,
2000, 65 FR 6393)

Interior, WBR—12: “Inventions and
Patents.” (Published July 28, 1999, 64
FR 40894)
Interior, WBR—13: “Irrigation

Management Service. “(Published June
3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—14: “Land Exchange.”
(Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—is: “Land Settlement
Entries.” (Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR
29876)
Interior, WBR—17: “Lands—Leases,
Sales, Rentals, and Transfers,”

(Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—19: “Mineral Location
Entries.” (Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR
29876)

Interior, WBR—22: “Oil and Gas
Applications.” (Published June 3, 1999,
64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—28: “Real Property and

Right-of-Way Acquisitions.” (Published
June 3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)

compromise there is a risk of harm to
economic or property interest, identity
theft or fraud, or harm to the security or

integrity of this system or other systems
or programs (whether maintained by
Reclamation or another agency or entity)
that rely upon the compromised
information; and
(c) The disclosure is made to such
agencies, entities and persons who are
reasonably necessary to assist in
connection with Reclamation’s efforts to
respond to the suspected or confirmed
compromise and prevent, minimize, or
remedy such harm.
IFR Doc. E8—8265 Filed 4—16—08; 8:45 aml
BILLING CODE 4310—MN-P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act

Interior, WBR—29: “Right-of-Way
Applications.” (Published June 3, 1999,
64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—31: “Acreage

Notice is hereby given that on April
10, 2008, a proposed consent decree in
United States, et a]., v. Weyerhaeuser

Limitation.” (Published March 17, 1999,
64 FR 13234)

the United States District Court for the
Western District of Washington.
In this action the United States, State
of Washington, Poyallup Tribe of
Indians and Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
sought natural resource damages for
releases of hazardous substances into
Commencement Bay, Washington.
Under the consent decree, defendant
will pay $728,884.00 in natural resource
damages and reimburse $47,441.99 in
damage assessment casts.
For thirty (30) days after the date of
this publication, the Department of
Justice will receive comments relating to
the Consent Decree. Comments should
be addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and either e-mailed
to pubcomment-ees.enrd@esdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044—7611. In either case, the
comments should refer to United States
v. Weyerhaeuser Co., No. 3 :08-cv-5220,

Interior, WBR—32: “Special Use
Applications, Licenses, and Permits.”
(Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)

Interior, WBR—37: “Trespass Cases.”
(Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)

Interior, WBR—38: “Water right
Applications.” (Published June 3, 1999,
64 FR 29876)

Interior, WBR—39: “Water Rights
Acquisition.” (Published June 3, 1999,
64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—40: “Water Sales and
Delivery Contracts.” (Published June 3,
1999, 64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—41: “Permits,”
(Published June 3, 1999, 64 FR 29876)
Interior, WBR—43: “Real Estate
Comparable Sales Data Storage.”
(Published June 23, 1999, 64 FR 33504)
Interior, WBR—45: “Equipment,
Supply, and Service Contracts.”
(Published August 11, 1999, 64 FR
43714)
Interior, WBR—48: “Lower Colorado
River Well Inventory.” (Published June
3, 1999, 64 FR 29874)

Ca., No. 3:08-cv-5220, was lodged with

D.J. Ref. No. 90—11—2—1049!12.

NEW ROUTINE USE:

During the comment period, the
Consent Decree may be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web

DISCLOSURES OUTSIDE THE DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR MAY BE MADE:

site: http ://www. usdaj.gov/enrd/
Consenti3ecrees.html. A copy of the

To appropriate agencies, entities, and
persons when:

Consent Decree may also be obtained by

(a) It is suspected or confirmed that
the security or confidentiality of
information in the system of records has
been compromised; and
(b) Reclamation has determined that
as a result of the suspected or confirmed

mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044—7611, or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwoad@usdai.gov),
fax no, (202) 514—0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514—1547. In

29874

federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 106/Thursday, June 3, 1999/Notices

Document Availability
Individuals wishing copies of the
habitat conservation plan and associated
documents for review should
immediately contact the above office.
Documents also will be available for
public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the
above address.

Background
Section 9 of the Act and federal
regulation prohibit the ‘take” of a
species listed as endangered or
threatened, respectively (take is defined
under the Act, in part, as to kill, harm,
or harass a federally listed species).
However, we may issue permits to
authorize “incidental take” (defined by
the Act as take that is incidental to, and
not the purposed of, the carrying out of
an otherwise lawful activity) of listed
species under limited circumstances.
Regulations governing permits for
threatened species are promulgated in
50 CFR 17.32; regulations governing
permits for endangered species are
promulgated in 50 CFR 17.22.
The Maytag Trail would be located on
Douglas County open space property.
The Maytag Trail is a component of a
regional trail system. The proposed trail
and associated facilities will consist of:
A main trail 8 feet wide and about
5,820 feet long;
Two trail loops 4 feet wide and about
3,030 feet long;
A trail overlook encompassing about
0.25 acres; and
A trailhead consisting of about 1.4
acres.
The trail surface will be soft (crusher
fines or crushed recycled concrete) or
native surface as appropriate for the trail
segment considering use and drainage.
Only one federally listed species, the
threatened Preble’s meadow jumping
mouse occurs on site and has the
potential to be adversely affected by the
proposed trail project. To minimize and
mitigate impacts that may result from
incidental take of the mouse, the
Country has agreed to: (1) coordinate
with the Colorado Division of Wildlife
to design and align the trail to minimize
potential impacts to the mouse; (2) plant
20 gambel oaks (south gulch crossing)
and 25 coyote willows (north gulch
crossing) where the trail crosses mouse
habitat to provide additional cover in
the vicinity of the trail; (3) provide only
in-kind services to the Colorado
Division of Wildlife to assist them in
determining the effects of the trail on
the mouse; (4) manage the riparian areas
of the property for mouse conservation;
and (5) limit trail use and construction
to daylight hours when the mouse is
inactive.

We have made a preliminary
determination that the County’s Plan
qualifies as a “low-effect” habitat
conservation plan as defined by our
Habitat Conservation Planning
Handbook (November 1996). Low-effect
habitat conservation plans are those
involving: (1) minor or negligible effects
on federally listed and candidate
species and their habitats; and (2) minor
or negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources. The
Maytag Trail Plan qualifies as a loweffect habitat conservation plan for the
following reasons:
1. Approval of the Plan would result
in minor or negligible effects on the
mouse and its habitat. The County’s
management of the property as open
space will likely have beneficial effects
to the mouse. We do not anticipate
significant direct or cumulative effects
to the mouse resulting from
construction or use of the trail.
3. Approval of the Plan would not
result in any cumulative or growth
inducing impacts and, therefore, would
not result in significant adverse effects
on public health or safety.
4. The Project does not require
compliance with Executive Order 11988
(Floodplain Management), Executive
Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands), or
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act.
nor does it threaten to violate a Federal,
State, local, or Tribal law or requirement
imposed for the protection of the
environment.
5. Approval of the Plan would not
establish a precedent for future action or
represent a decision in principle about
future actions with potentially
significant environmental effects.
We, therefore, have preliminarily
determined that approval of the Plan as
a categorical exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act, as
provided by the Department of the
Interior Manual (516 DM 2, Appendix 1
and 516 DM 6, Appendix 1). Based
upon this preliminary determination,
we do not intend to prepare further
National Environmental Policy Act
documentation. We will consider public
comments in making a final
determination on whether to prepare
such additional documentation.
This notice is provided pursuant to
section 10(c) of the Act. We will
evaluate the permit application, the
Plan, and comments submitted therein
to determine whether the application
meets the requirements of section 10(a)
of the Act. If it is determined that those
requirements are met, a permit will be
issued for the incidental take of the
Preble’s meadow jumping mouse in
conjunction with the construction and
use of the Maytag Trail. The final permit

decision will be made no sooner than 30
days from the date of this notice.
Dated: May 26, 1999.
Terry I. Terrell,
Deputy Regional Director, Region 6.

lFR Doc. 99—14004 Filed 6—2—99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310—55—M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Interior.
ACTION:

Notice of amendment to

approved Tribal-State Compact.

25 U.S.C. 2710, of
the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of
SUMMARY: Pursuant to

1988 (Pub. L. 100—497), the Secretary of

the Interior shall publish, in the Federal
Register, notice of approved Tribal-State
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in
Class III (casino) gambling on Indian

reservations. The Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs, Department of the
Interior, through his delegated
authority, has approved the First

Amendment to the Tribal/State Compact
for Class III Gaming between the
Kalispel Tribe of Indians and the State
of Washington, which was executed on
March 4, 1999.
DATES: This action is effective on June
3, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director Indian
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of

Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219—4066.
Dated: May 20, 1999.

Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 99—13999 Filed 6—2—99: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310—02—P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended;
System of Records
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.
ACTION:

Notice of minor changes to a

system of records.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5
U.S.C. 552a), notice is hereby given that
the Department of the Interior is
updating a system of records managed
by the Bureau of Reclamation

(Reclamation). The changes are to the

Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 106/Thursday, June 3, 1999/Notices
system of records Lower Colorado
River Well Inventory, WBR—48” which
is published in its entirety below.
DATES: These actions are effective June
3, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: for
information regarding “Lower Colorado
River Well Inventory, WBR—48’ contact
Mr. Jeffrey Addiego, Hydraulic
Engineer, Boulder Canyon Operations
Office at (702) 293—8525. for general
information regarding Reclamation’s
Privacy Act program, contact Mr. Casey
Snyder at (303) 445—2048.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When
originally published in the Federal
Register this system of records was
identified with an organization prefix of
“BOR” (e.g., BOR—48). The content of
the system of records is the same; the
prefix on this system was changed to
reflect organizational changes.
This system of records notice was
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 7, 1995 (60 FR 17805).
This publication revises the system
location, storage, and the system
manager and address. All other changes
proposed are editorial in nature.
Murlin Coffey,
Manager, Property and Office Services.
INTERIOR1WBR—48
SYSTEM NAME:

Lower Colorado River Well Inventory.
SYSTEM LOCATION:

U.S. Geological Survey, 520 North
Park Avenue, Suite 221, Tucson,
Arizona 85719 (paper records are
temporarily stored, waiting for entry
into the U.S. Geological Survey system,
at Bureau of Reclamation, Yuma Area
Office, 7301 Calle Agua Salada, Yuma,
Arizona 85364).
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:

Individuals and/or their lessees who
have at least one well on their property
that may pump mainstream Colorado
River water. Note: This system also
contains records pertaining to
corporations and other public entities.
Only those records relating to
individuals are covered by the Privacy
Act.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Names, addresses, and telephone
numbers of covered individuals;
Assessor Parcel Numbers; contract
numbers; categories of uses to which the
water is put; methods of disposal of
unconsumed portions of water pumped;
volumes of water pumped; physical
characteristics and locations of wells;
water purveyor, municipal, or other

administrative boundaries within which
wells are located; and water levels of
wells located in hydraulically
connected areas adjacent to the flood
plain.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

The Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902,
(32 Stat. 388, 43 U.S.C. 391), as
amended and supplemented; the
Colorado River Front Work and Levee
System Adjacent to Yuma Project Act of
March 3, 1925, (Pub. L. 79—469, 43 Stat.
1186, 1198), as amended and
supplemented; the Boulder Canyon
Project Act of December 21, 1928, (45
Stat. 1057, 43 U.S.C. 617), as amended
and supplemented; the Reclamation
Project Act of August 4, 1939, (53 Stat.
1187,43 U.S.C. 485); the Colorado River
Basin Project Act of September 30, 1968,
(82 Stat. 885); the Reclamation Reform
Act of October 12, 1982, (96 Stat. 1261,
43 U.S.C. 390); and the Supreme Court
opinion rendered June 3, 1963, (373
U.S. 546), and Decrees entered March 9,
1964, (376 U.S. 340), January 9, 1979,
(439 U.S. 419), and April 16, 1984, (466
U.S. 144), in Arizona v. California etal.
PURPOSE(S):

The primary purposes of the records
are: (a) To assist in the administration
and negotiation of water use contracts
with individual landowners, lessees, or
other classes of water users; and (b) to
support the annual compilation and
publication of records of consumptive
use of mainstream Colorado River water.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

Disclosure outside the Department of
the Interior may be made to: (1) The
States of Arizona, California, and
Nevada to assist them in administering
their apportionments of mainstream
Colorado River water; (2) Another
federal agency to enable that agency to
respond to an inquiry by the individual
to whom the record pertains; (3) The
Department of Justice, or to a court,
adjudicative, or other administrative
body, or to a party in litigation before
a court or adjudicative or administrative
body, when: (a) One of the following is
a party to the proceeding or has an
interest in the proceeding: (i) The
Department or any component of the
Department; (ii) Any Departmental
employee acting in his or her official
capacity; (iii) Any Departmental
employee acting in his or her individual
capacity where the Department or the
Department of Justice has agreed to
represent the employee; or (iv) The
United States, when the Department
determines that the Department is likely

29875

to be affected by the proceeding; and (b)
The Department deems the disclosure to
be: (i) Relevant and necessary to the
proceedings; and (ii) Compatible with
the purpose for which we compiled the
information; (4) The appropriate
Federal, State, tribal, local, or foreign
governmental agency that is responsible
for investigating, prosecuting, enforcing,
or implementing a statute, rule,
regulation, order, or license, when we
become aware of an indication of a
violation or potential violation of the
statute, rule, regulation, order, or
license; (5) A congressional office in
response to an inquiry to that office by
the individual to whom the records
pertain.
DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING
AGENCIES:

Disclosures pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(b)(12). Disclosures may be made
from this system to consumer reporting
agencies as defined in the fair Credit
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. l68a(t) or the
Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966
(31 U.S.C. 3701(a)(3)).
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
STORAGE:

Records are stored in automated form
on computer databases and in manual
form in file folders at the U.S.
Geological Survey, and in manual form
in file folders at the Bufeau of
Reclamation.
RETRIEVABILITY:

Records stored in computer databases
will be retrievable by any record
category. Records stored in manual files
will be retrievable by name of property
owner or contract holder.
SAFEGUARDS:

Data will be maintained with
safeguards meeting the requirements of
43 CfR 2.51 for manual and
computerized records.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

In accordance with approved
retention and disposal schedules,
records will be retained in the Bureau
of Reclamation for 10 years, relocated to
the federal Records Center and retained
there for an additional 75 years, and
then transferred to the National
Archives and Records Administration
for permanent retention.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

U.S. Geological Survey (NWIS), 520
North Park Avenue, Suite 221, Tucson,
Arizona 85719; and/or Bureau of
Reclamation, Yuma Area Office, 7301

29876

Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 106/Thursday, June 3, 1999/Notices

Calle Agua Salada, Yuma, Arizona
85364.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

An individual requesting notification
of the existence of records on him or her
should address his/her request to the
System Manager. The request must be in
writing, signed by the requester, and
comply with the content requirements
of 43 CFR 2.60.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

An individual requesting access to
records maintained on him or her
should address his/her request to the
System Manager. The request must be in
writing, signed by the requester, and
comply with the content requirements
of 43 CFR 2.63.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

An individual requesting amendment
of a record maintained on him or her
should address his/her request to the
System Manager. The request must be in
writing, signed by the requester, and
comply with the content requirements
of 43 CFR 2.71.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Individuals on whom records are
maintained, state and county well
permits, land ownership and water use
records and databases, and the U.S.
Geological Survey Ground Water Site
Inventory database.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:

None.
[FR Doc. 99—14006 filed 6—2—99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310—94—P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended;
Systems of Records
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.
ACTION: Notice of minor changes to 14

systems of records.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5
U.S.C. 552a), notice is hereby given that
the Department of the Interior proposes
minor changes to 14 systems of records
managed by the Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation). These notices are
published in their entirety below.
DATES: These actions are effective June
3, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information regarding these systems of
records contact Mr. Stan Seigal, Chief
Realty Officer, Policy Office at (303)

445—2915. For general information
regarding Reclamation’s Privacy Act
program, contact Mr. Casey Snyder at
(303) 445—2048.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Recent
Privacy Act Compilations list the
following systems of records with a
prefix of “Reclamation” (e.g.,
Reclamation-13). When originally
published in the Federal Register these
systems of records were identified with
an organization prefix of ‘LBR” (e.g.,
LBR— 13). The content of the systems of
records is the same; the prefixes on
these systems were changed to reflect
organizational changes.
The system of records notices being
revised and the reason for revision are
listed below:
This publication revises the system
locations; a “purpose(s)” section has
been added which was not included in
the original notices; the routine uses,
system manager’s titles, and addresses
have been updated. All other changes
are editorial in nature.
“Irrigation Management Service,
WBR—13,” previously published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19098); “Land Exchange, WBR—14,”
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 1977 (42 FR
19098); “Land Settlement Entries,
WBR—15,” previously published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19099); Lands—Leases, Sales,
Rentals, and Transfers, WBR—17;”
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 1977 (42 FR
19099); “Mineral Location Entries,
WBR—19;” previously published in the
federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19100); ‘Oil and Gas Applications,
WBR—22;” previously published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19101); “Real Property and Right-ofWay Acquisitions, WBR—28;”
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 1977 (42 FR
19103); “Right-of-Way Applications,
WBR—29;” previously published in the
federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19104); “Special Use Applications,
Licenses, and Permits, WBR—32;”
previously published in the federal
Register on April 11, 1977 (42 FR
19105); “Trespass Cases, WBR—37;”
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 11, 1977 (42 FR
19106); “Water Right Applications,
WBR—38;” previously published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19107); “Water Rights Acquisition,
WBR—39;” previously published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 1977 (42
FR 19107); “Water Sales and Delivery
Contracts, WBR—40;” previously
published in the Federal Register on

April 11, 1977 (42 FR 19107); and
“Permits, WBR—41;” previously
published in the Federal Register on
April 11, 1977 (42 FR 19108).
Murlin Coffey,
Manager, Property and Office Services.
INTERIORIWBR—f 3
SYSTEM NAME:

Irrigation Management Service.
SYSTEM LOCATION:

Commissioner’s Office, Reclamation
Service Center, and Regional Offices:
Pacific Northwest, Mid-Pacific, Lower
Colorado, Upper Colorado, and Great
Plains. See appendix for addresses.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:

Individuals receiving irrigation waters
from Bureau of Reclamation constructed
facilities.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Computer input, storage, and output
concerning water usage.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

43 U.S.C. 371, et seq.
PURPOSE(S):

The primary use of the record is to
assist farmers on Federal projects in the
selection of the proper amounts and
timing of irrigation deliveries.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

Disclosures outside the Department of
the Interior may be made to: (1) Another
Federal agency to enable that agency to
respond to an inquiry by the individual
to whom the record pertains; (2) The
Department of Justice, or to a court,
adjudicative, or other administrative
body, or to a party in litigation before
a court or adjudicative or administrative
body, when: (a) One of the following is
a party to the proceeding or has an
interest in the proceeding: (i) The
Department or any component of the
Department; (ii) Any Departmental
employee acting in his or her official
capacity; (iii) Any Departmental
employee acting in his or her individual
capacity where the Department or the
Department of Justice has agreed to
represent the employee; or (iv) The
United States, when the Department
determines that the Department is likely
to be affected by the proceeding; and (b)
The Department deems the disclosure to
be: (i) Relevant and necessary to the
proceedings; and (ii) Compatible with
the purpose for which we compiled the
information; (3) The appropriate
Federal, State, tribal, local, or foreign
governmental agency that is responsible