Form 0920-1009 Feedback Survey

1605 Recipient Meeting Survey
Part 1: Please rate the following sessions:
Form Approved
OMB No. 0920-1009
Exp. Date: 2/29/2020
Public Reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated at 9 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road NW, MS D-74, Atlanta, GA 30333; Attn:
PRA (0920-1009).

Thank you for attending the CE16-1605 Preventing Teen Dating and Youth Violence by Addressing Shared Risk and Protective Factors
2019 Recipient Meeting. We’re always looking for ways to continuously improve our programs. Please take a moment to provide us
with feedback about the 2019 Recipient Meeting. The information collected will be used to identify areas of improvement for future
recipient meetings and technical assistance efforts, and allow for ongoing communication and collaboration with funded recipients.
This should take no more than 9 minutes to complete. Please complete this survey by ____. All responses will be kept confidential and
information will only be shared in its aggregate form.
You can edit previous responses as you complete the survey; however, you must complete the survey in one sitting or you will lose all
of your responses. To return to a previous page, use the ‘Previous’ button at the bottom of the page (NOT the “Back” button on your
browser menu). To advance, use the “Next” button at the bottom of the page.
If you have any questions, please contact Melissa Bing, MPH (poe7@cdc.gov).
Day 1

1. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Presentation
Presenter: Valerie Daniel, MPH, CHES, Health Communications Specialist, CDC
Overview: This presentation explained what Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) were and demonstrated
how youth violence and teen dating violence are two violence outcomes that can be prevented when we prevent
ACEs.
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The content of this
session was useful to
my work.
The tools and handouts
were high quality.
The format of this
session was appropriate
for the content.
The amount of time
dedicated to this session
was just right.
Additional Comments:

1

2. 1605 Initiative Evaluation and Cost Study
Presenters:
Ketra Rice, PhD, Economist, CDC
Phyllis Ottley, PhD, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Linda Vo, MPH, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Overview: Recipients learned about 1605 initiative level evaluation and heard evaluation findings.
Participants also learned about the various components of a cost evaluation and the types of information
needed for the 1605 cost study data collection activities.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate in
this session

The
content of
the session
was useful
to my work.
The tools
and
handouts
were high
quality.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

2

3. Overview of CDC's National Centers of Excellence in Youth Violence Prevention (YVPCs) University of Louisville YVPC
Presenter:
Aimee Trudeau, MPH, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Monique Williams, MPH, Director, University of Louisville’s National Center of Excellence in Youth
Violence Prevention

Overview: This session provided an overview of YVPCs and describe the development of the University of
Louisville YVPC social norms campaign: Pride, Peace, Prevention.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The content of this
session was useful to
my work.
The tools and handouts
were high quality.
The format of this
session was appropriate
for the content.
The amount of time
dedicated to this session
was just right.
The small group activity
was helpful.
Additional Comments:

3

4. Overview of Minneapolis Youth Congress
Presenter: Ramiro Vasquez Jr., Youth Development Specialist, Minneapolis Youth Coordinating Board
Overview: Representatives from the Minneapolis Youth Congress (MYC), a representative body of youth
that has authentic power and influence in decisions and policies relevant to youth in Minneapolis, provided
practical examples of how government jurisdictions can authentically engage young people.
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

4

5. Community Bus Tour
Presenter: Youth Coordinating Board
Overview: Youth Coordinating Board (YCB) staff led participants on a guided bus tour of parts of
Minneapolis.
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

Day 2

5

6. Building Connections and Coordination across Strategies that Address Multiple Forms of
Violence: Peer to Peer Facilitated Discussion
Presenter:
Aisha Burgess, Program Director, Baltimore City Health Department
Linda McGlone, MPH, Coordinator, Monterey County Health Department
Kelly Wells, MPA, Training and Technical Assistance Lead, VPTAC Staff at American Institutes of
Research
Kathleen Guarino, LMHC, Senior TA Consultant, VPTAC Staff at American Institutes of Research

Overview: In this session, participants heard from their colleagues about the ways that 1605 recipients are
building connections and coordinating across violence prevention efforts in their communities.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

6

7. Beyond 1605: The Minneapolis Office of Violence Prevention
Presenter:
Constance Rhodes, Violence Intervention Specialist, Hennepin Healthcare System Next Step
Program
Tamara Stark, Senior Director of Housing and Youth Development
Annika Olson, RILE Youth Advisory Committee Member
Ashley Handberg, Parent Support Care Manager, The Link
Erin Sikkink, Public Health Specialist, Minneapolis Health Department
Josh Peterson, Senior Public Health Specialist, Minneapolis Health Department
Sasha Cotton, Director, Minneapolis Health Department

Overview: 1605 is one effort among a broad and diverse array of violence prevention initiatives and
programs in Minneapolis. In this session, partners from some of the other programs shared about their
efforts to ensure young people are free from violence and other negative outcomes.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

7

8. Historical Trauma and its Links to Violence, Present Trauma, Masculinity, and Relationship
Violence
Presenter: Sam Simmons, Consultant, Minneapolis Health Department
Overview: This presentation increased awareness of the intersections between community violence and
historical and/or intergenerational trauma.
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

8

9. Communicating to Engage Multiple Sectors in Violence Prevention
Presenter:
Kelly Wells, MPA, Training and Technical Assistance Lead, VPTAC Staff at American Institutes of
Research
Patrick Cook, Senior Communications Specialist, VPTAC Staff at Cook & Sow Communications

Overview: This presentation provided an overview of strategic program communication and how to engage
multiple stakeholder groups in prevention efforts to support program success and sustainability.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The content of this
session was useful to
my work.
The tools and handouts
were high quality.
The format of this
session was appropriate
for the content.
The amount of time
dedicated to this session
was just right.
The small group activity
was helpful.
Additional Comments:

9

10. Essential Allies: The Unique Impact of the YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities
Presenter:
Hedy Lemar Walls, EdD Chief Social Responsibility Officer, YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities
Lisa Pung Michaelson, Executive Director, YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities Youth Intervention
Services

Overview: This session highlighted the nationally recognized Social Responsibility and Youth Intervention
Services work of the YMCA of the Greater Twin Cities (YGTC).
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

Day 3

10

11. Using Indicators to Tell Your Impact Story
Presenter:
Phyllis Ottley, PhD, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Linda Vo, MPH, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Overview: Recipients participated in a workshop to gain valuable knowledge about using evaluation
data to tell stories about the impact of their programs.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The content of this
session was useful to
my work.
The tools and handouts
were high quality.
The format of this
session was appropriate
for the content.
The amount of time
dedicated to this session
was just right.
The small group activity
was helpful.
Additional Comments:

11

12. Impact Statement Workshop
Presenter: Samantha Sileno, CHES, Public Health Advisor, CDC

Overview: This presentation provided an overview of strategic program communication and how to engage
multiple stakeholder groups in prevention efforts to support program success and sustainability.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The content of this
session was useful to
my work.
The tools and handouts
were high quality.
The format of this
session was appropriate
for the content.
The amount of time
dedicated to this session
was just right.
The small group activity
was helpful.
Additional Comments:

12

13. Next Steps -> Moving into Year 4
Presenter:
Brenton Guy, MS, Public Health Advisor, CDC
Corey Lumpkin, MPH, Public Health Advisor, CDC
Phyllis Ottley, PhD, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Linda Vo, MPH, Behavioral Scientist, CDC
Kelly Wells, MPA, Training and Technical Assistance Lead, Violence Prevention Technical Assistance
Center (VPTAC)
Kathleen Guarino, LMHC, Senior TA Consultant, Violence Prevention Technical Assistance Center
(VPTAC)
Patrick Cook, Senior Communications Specialist, Violence Prevention Technical Assistance Center
(VPTAC)

Overview: This session focused on next steps needed for recipients to have a successful year 4. It
focused on the following topics: 1) Cross-Cutting Approaches; 2) Sustainability; 3) Implementation and
Expansion of Strategies; 4) Strategic Planning and Coalition Building; and 5) Evaluation/CQI
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The
content of
this session
was useful
to my work.
The format
of this
session
was
appropriate
for the
content.
The
amount of
time
dedicated
to this
session
was just
right.
Additional Comments:

13

1605 Recipient Meeting Survey
Part 2: Please provide feedback on the Ignite Presentations
14. Ignite Presentations
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

I did not participate
in this session

The content of the Ignite
Presentations was
useful to my work.
The format of the Ignite
Presentations was
appropriate for the
content
The amount of time
dedicated to the Ignite
Presentation was just
right.
Additional Comments:

14

1605 Recipient Meeting Survey
Part 3: Please respond to the following questions
15. How would you rate the overall recipient meeting on:
Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

The overall quality of the
meeting?
The content of the
meeting?
The quality of speakers?
The format of the
meeting?
The opportunity to
network?

16. Did you have the opportunity to network or participate in peer-to-peer engagement during the recipient
meeting?
Yes
No

17. What aspect of the recipient meeting did you find MOST useful?

18. What aspects of the meeting did you find LEAST useful?

19. What topics would you like to see addressed in future technical assistance sessions or meetings?

15

1605 Recipient Meeting Survey
Part 4: Please respond to the following questions
20. What is one thing learned from the recipient meeting that you are interested in implementing now?

21. What is one thing learned from the recipient meeting that you are planning to do by the end of the
project?

22. Please rank order your technical assistance needs:
´

Cross-Cutting Approaches

´

Evaluation and Continuous Quality Improvement

´

Implementation and Expansion of Strategies

´

Strategic Planning and Coalition Building

´

Sustainability

´

Other

23. What topics would you like to receive technical assistance on in the following formats?
Individual
Group
Peer-to-Peer
Online Learning Event
Training
Site Visit
Other

24. What topics would you like to learn more about?

16

25. What recipient sites would you like to learn more about? Select all that apply.
Baltimore

Monterey

Minneapolis

Multnomah

Houston
Other (please specify)

17

1605 Recipient Meeting Survey
Part 5: Please respond to the following questions
26. Which of the following best describes your current position? Select one only.
CDC employee, contractor, or fellow

Academic/university employee

Other federal government employee, contractor, or fellow

Non-governmental, community, or other organization
employee

State/local health department employee
Other (please specify)

27. Which of the following best describes the work you do on the CE16-1605 project? Select all that apply.
Evaluation

Strategic planning

Strategy implementation

Sustainability

Coalition building

Administrative

Other (please specify)

28. What site do you represent?
Baltimore

Monterey

Houston

Multnomah

Minneapolis

CDC

Other (please specify)

18