Affordable Care Act Internal Claims and Appeals and External Review Procedures for Non-grandfathered Group Health Plans and Issuers and Individual Market Issuers (CMS-10338)
ICR 201606-0938-004 · OMB 0938-1099 · Historical Active
⚠️ Notice: This information collection may be outdated. More recent filings for OMB 0938-1099 can be found here:
Affordable Care Act Internal Claims and Appeals and External Review Procedures for Non-grandfathered Group Health Plans and Issuers and Individual Market Issuers (CMS-10338)
The information collection requirements included in the claims procedure regulation ensure that participants and beneficiaries (claimants) receive adequate information regarding the plan's claims procedures and the plan's handling of specific benefit claims. Participants and beneficiaries need to understand plan procedures and plan decisions in order to appropriately request benefits and/or appeal benefit denials.
The information collection requirements are necessary for the Federal external review process to provide an independent external review as requested by claimants.
One of the critical components of the original burden estimates was the number of plans expected to lose grandfathered status. These estimates have been updated based on more recent Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) data. There is nearly double the original estimate of non-grandfathered plans now subject to the Appeals regulation. Changes in the estimates for external review costs and the rate of external review requests also impacted the expected burden. The hour and cost burdens have been updated based on improved estimates of the costs associated with external review and the rate of external review. For example, the external review rate used to determine the expected number of external reviews was .03%. This rate was based on the Office of Personnel Management’s experience in operating the Federal Employee Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP). However, since OPM is no longer administering the HHS Federal External Review Program, we have updated our rate
based on what state external review experience, such as data from the state of North Carolina. It is believed that this new rate is a more accurate reflection of the rate at which consumers request external reviews. Based on these adjustments, the estimated annual responses have increased from 218,657,161 to 399,154,868.
$168,015
No
No
Yes
No
No
Uncollected
Jamaa Hill 301 492-4190
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.