2014_12d2-2_ form 25 Supporting_Statement

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
for the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
Rule 12d2-2 and Form 25

A.

Justification
1.

Information Collection Necessity

Section 12(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 generally makes it
unlawful for any member, broker, or dealer to effect any transaction in any security (other than
an exempted security) on a national securities exchange unless the security is effectively
registered on that exchange in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the rules
thereunder. Section 12(d) of the Act provides that a security registered with a national securities
exchange may be withdrawn or stricken from listing on an exchange in accordance with the rules
of the exchange, and upon such terms as the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Commission”) may deem necessary, upon application by the issuer of the security or by the
exchange to the Commission.
Rule 12d2-2 (“Rule”) and Form 25 (“Form 25”) were adopted in 1935 and 1952,
respectively, pursuant to Sections 12 and 23 of the Act. The Rule sets forth the conditions and
procedures under which a security may be delisted from an exchange and withdrawn from
registration under Section 12(b) of the Act. The Commission adopted amendments to Rule
12d2-2 and Form 25. 2 Under the amended Rule, all issuers and national securities exchanges
seeking to delist and deregister a security in accordance with the rules of an exchange must file
the adopted version of Form 25 with the Commission. The Commission has also adopted
amendments to Rule 19d-1 under the Act to require exchanges to file the adopted version of
Form 25 as notice to the Commission under Section 19(d) of the Act. Finally, the Commission
has adopted amendments to exempt standardized options and security futures products from
Section 12(d) of the Act. These amendments are intended to simplify the paperwork and
procedure associated with a delisting and to unify general rules and procedures relating to the
delisting process.
2.

Information Collection Purpose and Use

The Form 25 is useful because it informs the Commission that a security previously
traded on an exchange is no longer traded. In addition, the Form 25 enables the Commission to
verify that the delisting has occurred in accordance with the rules of the exchange. Further, the
Form 25 helps to focus the attention of delisting issuers to make sure that they abide by the
proper procedural and notice requirements associated with a delisting and/or withdrawal from
registration under Section 12(b) of the Act. Without the Rule and the Form 25, as applicable, the
Commission would be unable to fulfill its statutory responsibilities.

1

15 U.S.C. 78b et seq.

2

See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52029 (July 14, 2005), 70 FR 42456 (July 22, 2005).

3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

A national securities exchange previously had the option of filing the Form 25 either
through a paper submission or through the Commission’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis
and Retrieval (EDGAR) System. 3 Issuers previously filed applications for delisting and/or
withdrawal from registration under Section 12(b) of the Act on paper with the Commission.
Rule 12d2-2, as amended, requires that national securities exchanges and issuers file a Form 25
electronically through EDGAR. 4 These changes will minimize the burdens of filing on national
securities exchanges and issuers.
4.

Duplication

Not applicable.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

Not applicable. Neither the national securities exchanges, who must comply with both
the Rule and the Form, nor any issuer obligated to respond under the Rule, would be considered
a small business as described in the OMB guidelines for completing this Submission.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

If the collection of information were conducted less frequently, the Commission would
not have the timely information necessary to ensure that delisting and/or withdrawal from
registration under Section 12(b) of the Act continue to be accomplished in accordance with the
respective rules of the national securities exchanges and the rule, and that such exchanges remain
in compliance with Section 12(d) of the Act. Since the information required by the Rule and the
Form 25, as applicable, is not otherwise available to the Commission, such Rule and Form 25 are
necessary for the Commission to fulfill its statutory responsibilities.

3

See Securities Act Release No. 33-8099 (May 14, 2002) (Adopting amendments to Regulation ST under the Securities Act of 1933, 17 CFR 232.10 et seq.).

4

The Commission notes that issuers file the Form 25 through EDGAR and exchanges file the
Form 25-NSE through EDGAR. Form 25-NSE is not a separate form but rather, is a submission
type in EDGAR designed to, among other things, allow the Commission to track the number of
Form 25s filed by exchanges only. The submission type refers to Form variations that filers use
on EDGAR to fulfill their filing obligation. Thus, the paper Form 25 is implemented on EDGAR
as two different submission types including: 25 and 25-NSE. For purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act extension to Form 25 therefore, the extension applies to both submission types
since there is only one single Form 25.

2

7.

Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

There are no special circumstances. This collection is consistent with the guidelines in 5
CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
8.

Consultations Outside the Commission

The required Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on this collection of information was published. No public comments were received.
9.

Payment or Gift

Not applicable.
10.

Confidentiality

Not applicable.
11.

Sensitive Questions

No information of a sensitive nature will be required under these collections of
information. These information collections collect basic Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
that may include name, business address, and residential address (for sole proprietor only),
telephone/cellular/facsimile numbers, and email address. The information collection is covered
under the following System of Records Notices (SORN).
http://www.sec.gov/about/privacy/sorn/secsorn7.pdf
12.

Information Collection Burden

There are 18 national securities exchanges that could possibly be respondents complying
with the requirements of the Rule and Form 25. 5 Additionally, any issuer whose security is
listed on a national securities exchange which seeks to remove such security from listing and/or
registration on that exchange will be subject to the requirements of subparagraph (c) of the Rule.
Although the burdens of complying with the Rule and Form 25 are not evenly distributed among
the exchanges, since there are many more securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the
NASDAQ Stock Market, and NYSEMKT than on the other national securities exchanges, the
staff has assumed, solely for the purpose of making these estimates, that the number of responses
would be evenly distributed among the exchanges.

5

The staff notes that a few of these 18 registered national securities exchanges only have rules to
permit the listing of standardized options, which are exempt from Rule 12d2-2 under the Act.
Nevertheless, we have counted national securities exchanges that can only list options as potential
respondents because these exchanges could potentially adopt new rules, subject to Commission

3

In 2013, the Commission received approximately 690 responses from the national
securities exchanges on Form 25s, for the purpose of delisting equity securities. Therefore, the
Commission expects that under the Rule, exchanges would handle approximately 690 Form 25s
for delisting applications annually. Assuming, on average, one reporting hour per response, the
resultant aggregate annual reporting hour burden would be 690 annual burden hours for all
exchanges (18 exchanges x an average of 38.3 responses per exchange x 1 hour per response).
The internal cost of compliance is $36,397.50 ($52.75 per response 6 x 690 responses).
In 2013, the Commission received approximately 100 responses from issuers voluntarily
applying to remove their securities from listing and registration on exchanges. Therefore, the
Commission expects that issuers would file approximately 100 such requests from issuers
annually. The aggregate annual reporting hour burden on issuers filing a Form 25 would be,
assuming on average one reporting hour per response, 100 annual burden hours for all issuers
(100 issuers x 1 response per issuer x 1 hour per response), at an internal cost of compliance of
$6,400 ($64 per response 7 x 100 responses).
Accordingly, the total annual hour burden for all respondents to comply with the Rule is
790 hours (690 hours for exchanges + 100 hours for issuers).
(..continued)
approval under Section 19(b) of the Act, to list and trade equity and other securities that have to
comply with Rule 12d2-2 under the Act. Notice registrants that are registered as national
securities exchanges solely for the purposes of trading securities futures products have not been
counted since, as noted above, securities futures products are exempt from complying with Rule
12d-2-2 under the Act and therefore do not have to file Form 25.
6

For national securities exchanges filing a Form 25, the staff has computed the average internal cost of
compliance per response to be approximately $52.75, representing one reporting hour per response,
including:
quarter hour of legal work
quarter hour of compliance work (Examiner)
half hour of compliance work (Clerk)

@
@
@

$82/hour
$71/hour
$29/hour

=
=
=

20.50
17.75
14.50
$52.75

7

For issuers filing a Form 25, the staff has computed the average cost per response to be approximately
$64.00, representing one reporting hour per response, including:
half hour of attorney work
half hour of paralegal work

@
@

$82/hour
$46/hour

=
=

41.00
23.00
$64.00

4

13.

Costs to Respondents

Not applicable; (a) it is not anticipated that respondents will have to incur any capital and
start up cost to comply with the Rule; (b) it is not anticipated that the respondents will have to
incur any additional operational or maintenance cost to comply with the Rule.
14.

Costs to Federal Government

There are no agency records prior to fiscal year 1981 that would permit the Commission
staff to compute the cost of developing the Rule or Form 25. Concerning ongoing costs to the
Federal Government, based on its experience with reviewing and processing delisting notices
and applications, the Commission staff believes that the operational costs to the Commission of
processing a Form 25 is approximately $14.38. Since approximately 790 responses are received
by the Commission annually, the total estimated cost to the Federal Government would be
approximately $11,360.20. These estimates were arrived at based on computations of staff time
devoted to processing these responses and related overhead costs (valued at 25 percent of the
cost of staff time, in accordance with the formulas set forth in the Guide to Estimating Reporting
Costs (1973)).
15.

Changes in Burden

The increase in burden is a result of an increase in the number of forms filed with the
Commission due to market conditions.
16.

Information Collections Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not applicable. The information collection is not used for statistical purposes.
17.

Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date

We request authorization to omit the expiration date on the electronic version of the
form. Including the expiration date on the electronic version of the form will result in increased
costs, because the need to make changes to the form may not follow the application’s scheduled
version release date. The OMB control number will be displayed.
18.

Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

This collection complies with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.
B.

Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods
This collection does not involve statistical methods.
5