10 CFR Part 52, U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Aircraft Impact Design Certification Amendment

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
10CFR52 ABWR Comment #3.pdf Supplementary Document	2011-11-03
10CFR52 ABWR Comment #2.pdf Supplementary Document	2011-11-03
10CFR52 ABWR Comment #1.pdf Supplementary Document	2011-11-03
10CFR52 ABWR FR SS 110111.doc Supporting Statement A	2011-11-03

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
200059	10 CFR Part 52, U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Aircraft Impact Design Certification Amendment	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3150-0210	ICR Reference No: 201201-3150-005
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201111-3150-001
Agency/Subagency: NRC	Agency Tracking No:
Title: 10 CFR Part 52, U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Aircraft Impact Design Certification Amendment
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 01/27/2012
	Date Received in OIRA: 01/27/2012
Terms of Clearance: In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three years. OMB requests that the agency fold the recordkeeping and reporting requirements from this collection into the primary 10 CFR Part 52 collection.

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	11/30/2014	36 Months From Approved
Responses	2	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	6	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 52, U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Aircraft Impact Design Certification Amendment The NRC is amending its regulations to certify an amendment to the U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (U.S. ABWR)standard plant design to comply with the NRC's aircraft impact assessment (AIA) regulations. This action allows applicants or licensees intending to construct and operate a U.S. ABWR to comply with the NRC's AIA regulations by referencing the amended design certification rule (DCR). The applicant for certification of the amendment to the U.S. ABWR design is STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC).

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 83 - 703 68 STAT 919 Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
3150-AI84	Final or interim final rulemaking	76 FR 78096	12/16/2011

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
10 CFR Part 52, U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Aircraft Impact Design Certification Amendment

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	2	0	0	2	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	6	0	0	6	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Changing Regulations

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The overall burden for this final rule will increase by 6 hours from 204,075 hours to 204,081 hours because of the following: (1) requiring combined license applicants to report information demonstrating that an entity other than the original applicant is qualified to supply the U.S. ABWR certified design, or this amendment to the U.S. ABWR certified design, unless the original applicant supplies the design for the combined license applicant's use; (2) an applicant referencing the U.S. ABWR design, that proposes to depart from the information required by 10 CFR 52.47(a)(28) to be included in the FSAR, to consider the effect of the changed AIA feature or capability on the original 10 CFR 50.150(a) assessment and to document how the modified design features and functional capabilities continue to meet the assessment requirements in 10 CFR 50.150(a)(1); and (3) the applicant for this amendment to the U.S. ABWR design, and any applicant of licensee referencing this amendment, to maintain a copy of the aircraft impact assessment performed to comply with the requirements 10 CFR 50.150(a) for the term of the term of the certification or license (including any period of renewal).

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/03/2011

---